First Nations Consultation
The Canadian courts have said
that the federal and provincial governments owe a special duty to First
Nations. This duty arises because the
historic relationship between First Nations and the governments of Canada, and the
fact that the federal and provincial governments exercise control over the
traditional territories of the First Nations.
One of the most tangible ways
in which land use decisions must reflect this duty is the obligation of
government to consult First Nations.
Common Law duty to Consult
The Courts have said that the
government must consult about any decision that is likely to affect aboriginal
rights. This consultation must be
meaningful. If the government fails to
do so the decision that is made without consultation can be set aside by the
courts, and the government ordered to start again, this time with adequate
consultation.
Until recently it was assumed
that this duty to consult belonged to government alone. However, a recent decision of the BC Court
of Appeal suggests that where a private company has been granted rights by the
government that clearly can impact on aboriginal rights, the company may also
have a duty to consult the First Nation.
It is not always clear how
extensive consultation with First Nations needs to be. Can the government just invite written
comment and then ignore it? What is
adequate consultation will be decided on a case-by-case basis.
The consultation must be
“meaningful”, and that will ordinarily mean that there must be a good faith
duty to try to accommodate concerns of the First Nation. The extent of consultation required will
vary according to the types of aboriginal rights
asserted (aboriginal title being one of the strongest) and the strength of the
evidence that those rights exist.
The First Nation itself can
help define what is meant by meaningful consultation. However, it cannot refuse to participate in consultation at all
and then object because of lack of consultation. As a practical matter many First Nations find it difficult to
respond to all the invitations for consultation that they receive.
Consultation is required before
a government decision is made that may affect First Nations rights. However, adequate consultation is also one
of the factors that the courts will look to when evaluating whether the infringement of an aboriginal right is “justified”. Consequently, some First Nations are
reluctant to participate in consultations for fear that the will be ignored,
and their participation will be used to justify the eventual decision.
Government Policy and Consultation
Not all government
decision-makers can be well versed in their constitutional obligation to
consult First Nations. Consequently the
provincial government has developed the “Provincial
Policy for Consultation with First Nations” to set out what decision-makers
should do. It sets out a five-part consultation
process:
·
Pre-Consultation Assessment
·
Stage 1 - Initiate Consultation
·
Stage 2 - Consider the impact of the decision on
aboriginal interests
·
Stage 3 - Consider whether any likely infringement of
aboriginal interests could be justified in the event that those interests were
proven subsequently to be existing aboriginal rights and/or title
·
Stage 4 - Look for opportunities to accommodate
aboriginal interests and/or negotiate resolution bearing in mind the potential
for setting precedents that may impact other Ministries or agencies.
Individual ministries may have more detailed policies
about how they will consult First Nations.
However, the provincial policy should apply to all BC Government
decision-makers.
Related Guide Pages:
·
Aboriginal Rights and Title.
·
Infringement of Aboriginal Rights.
For more information about First Nations
Consultation:
·
Provincial
Policy for Consultation with First Nations, developed by the Province’s
Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management;
·
“Aboriginal
Rights and Title” section of the B.C. Ministry of Forests Policy Manual.